Every Political Action Causes a Cyber Reaction


Just as Newton’s Third Law of motion states “for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction” a similar notion can be applied to the recent news of financial organizations being hacked.

Just this week, it has been widely reported that Russian hackers were the source of attacks on JP Morgan and four other financial organizations. One can surmise that this was politically motivated by U.S. sanctions against the Russian government.  If you take a step back and look at the bigger picture, for every real world government action, there will be a cyber-reaction. This is the latest example of this trend and isn’t just a problem for Washington. We’ve seen this around the world.

More than ever, our world seems wrought in strife and civil discontent:

Nation-State Oriented:

  • Israel / Gaza
  • Ukraine/Russia
  • Syria (internal)
  • Iraq (internal)
  • Afghanistan (internal)
  • Egypt (internal)
  • Libya (internal)
  • Somalia (internal)
  • India / Pakistan
  • Sudan (internal)
  • China / Japan (South China Sea)


  • World Cup
  • Ukraine Presidential Elections
  • Ferguson, Missouri / Michael Brown Shooting Conflict

What these events all have in common is that each conflict has included cyber-attack weapons and attacks. In other words, as mankind physically struggles with each other, there has been new outgrowth with corollary cyber techniques. Here are three examples:

World Cup

  • Real World Action: The Brazilian government spends billions on creating new stadiums and enhancing infrastructure in preparation of the estimated 500,000 soccer fans who travelled to Brazil this past June for the World Cup.
  • Tension Creating Issue: As thousands of native Brazilians lived in poverty, tensions began to rise about the government spending on this sporting event while turning a blind eye to the need for schools, hospitals and addressing social economic issues.
  • Cyber Reaction: The hacktivist group, Anonymous creates #OpWorldCup and #OpHackingCup to target not only the Brazilian government, but companies that sponsored the event.  Major consumer brands such as Adidas, Budweiser, Coca-Cola and Emirates Airline were also targeted due to their involvement with this major sporting event.

Ukraine Elections

  • Real World Action: Ukraine holds its Presidential Elections to elect a new president just three months after the previous president, Viktor Yanukovych was ousted in a coup.   
  • Tension Creating Issue: President Yanukovych caused anger with many Ukrainians by refusing to take needed steps to bring the country closer to the European Union. This evolved into protests that escalated into the demand for a better government.
  • Cyber Reaction: This past May, a group of pro-Russian hackers called “CyberBerkut” infiltrated the computers of Ukraine’s Central Election Commission deleting key files and installed malicious software.  Had this nefarious software remain undetected, it would have shown an incorrect winner of the presidential election, essentially putting a person in power who in actuality, received 1% of national votes.

Ferguson, Missouri

  • Real World Action: In the St. Louis suburb of Ferguson, MO, a police officer shot and killed an unarmed teenager during an altercation.
  • Tension Creating Issue: With circumstances of the shooting highly disputed between two sides, massive protests and civil unrest prompting Missouri’s governor to mobilize State Police and the National Guard in Ferguson. This shooting has prompted citizens in major cities throughout the U.S. to start peaceful marches in their own city streets.  
  • Cyber Reaction: Hacktivist group Anonymous crashed the city’s web servers which forced city officials to communicate by text and even urged citizens of Ferguson, Mo., to confront the police in the streets.

So, what’s the lesson to be learned here?

  1. Recognize that when strife hits – – so will a cyber-attack.
  2. Cyber-attacks will increase your costs and complications of some of the world’s oldest conflicts
  3. Due to association with a cause, an organization is much more likely to be drawn into a conflict, then not
  4. Immediate and direct actions are needed BEFORE an attack in order to successful navigate the risks

The events above are neither a definitive list nor are they ranked in any particular way.  This post is merely a very short compilation of some of the most covered, politically-motivated cyber-attacks that I’ve seen this year. While companies and institutions cannot predict how these political actions will impact their organizations, this shows the importance of having staff trained on the latest cyber-security risks, as well as participation in information-sharing organizations that can turn threats into actionable intel. In light of this recent attack on the financial community, it is recommend that all financial services companies exercise extreme care with their security postures over the near term. I welcome you all to leave your thoughts in the comments below about other events I may not have included.


  1. There is also of course the desire of the US government to, for whatever insane reason, to go to war against Russia- a war impossible to win. I’m guessing the evidence which shows Russia is somehow behind these cyber attacks will be withheld “in the interest of national security”.

  2. War begets more war: let us remember that in the uS at least voters have the power. Let us use our power to vote our conscience. Let us act powerfully. I liked the TED talk by Gloria Steinem: sometimes the solution to a problem is: keep the elephants from eating the maize.

  3. I still say Putin has a long arm in this cyber-sabotage activity. He needs to destabilize US officials to keep eyes away from his ambitions in Ukraine. ISL incident is helping but he continues to ignore the fact that we can deal with a plethora of situations simultaneously that would include protecting the Ukraine, which we have been reluctant to do thus far. Maybe due to the planning for this ISL campaign or hoping Mr. Stalin Jr. will stick to the cease-fire accord. We’ll see.

  4. Better government? Ukraine right now has wages lower than some of the 3rd world countries of Africa and the EU is not going to accept them. Why the fck would EU accept Ukraine with its problems, exactly – it wont.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here